Henry David Thoreau described walking as a ‘holy art’, derived from
those who set out ‘à la Sainte Terre’ (saunter), to the Holy Lands in the
Middle Ages. Walking 100 miles, however, may seem less of a pilgrimage and more
of a punishment, and certainly involves more profanities than any holy art
should. But there is something to be said for its epic qualities.
Preparations are biblical in proportion, and probably incredibly
annoying for anyone who is not interested or has to live with someone who is
obsessively going over a route description for the 27th time, checking the
weather three times a day, working out what to eat and when, and the optimal way
to bandage feet and change socks en route.
And like any good religious allegory, that which is written in the aftermath
is more likely to be based on scraps of memory that have a tendency to
shape-shift with each retelling. As the pain and blisters are forgotten the
route is relived and the mythic quality of the challenge grows: the brightness of the full moon
that lit our path, the appearance of a 'swamp man' who guided people safely through the mud,
the forbidding presence of Scrawsden Farm (I'm sure the owners are lovely people
but I'm pretty sure their dogs belong in a 'Twilight' movie).
The beauty that I do remember is that of walking within the quietness
that descends on people who must concentrate to stay awake, stay on track and
stay upright. It is both funny and concerning to see people falling asleep on
their feet and veering off into the bushes. I had my own scrapes with the
countryside, mostly brought about by trying to read the map and route
description at night and walk in a straight line at the same time.
Now a route description, like all good myths, is a very subjective thing,
being just one person’s interpretation of the landscape. For example, where our
route description said ‘bear right 90 degrees to pass along a ridge and then
bear left 270 degrees to head towards the tor opposite’, I would probably have
said something like ‘just head for the great big rock on the hill … you can’t
miss it’. And the instruction to ‘pass on
the right side of the line of trees/barn/ruin’ becomes tricky when you start to
ponder if that should be your right or the tree’s right; a choice that is not helped
by my directional dyslexia. It is perhaps ironic that I choose orienteering as
a sport but tattooing the letters ‘R’ and ‘L’ on the appropriate hands has
helped.
There is fantastic satisfaction when shedding a page of route
description and map at every checkpoint, indicative as it is of another set of
miles done and only so many more to go. But this joy is matched only by the
terror of getting down the road and realising that you have accidently thrown
away the wrong page. This swinging of emotions is perhaps the best way to
describe what it’s like to walk 100 miles. Finding the peanut butter sandwiches
at a checkpoint … joy. Finding you have to wade through yet another field of mud …
not joy. And so it goes for, in my case, 35 hours and 40 minutes.
The physical existence of the route description became a lifeline to
reality, though, when approaching evening on the second day. I avoided the
hallucinations that many who complete 100s have suffered, but instead was
struck several times in the last miles by moments of transcendence when I
was suddenly aware that I didn’t know what I was doing, why I was doing it or
where I was going. All I knew was that I had to follow the route description. This
incoherent rambling apparently continued verbally for some time after the event
as reported by my long-suffering partner who once again was spending a weekend
waiting in a community hall for me to arrive bearing a litany of things lost, bent, broken, unclean and drifting.
The transcendence is probably a neat trick on the part of the body to
try to get the head to stop overriding the pain indicators that by about 40
miles are already starting to max out depending on how hard you go. Blisters,
for example, can reach impressive proportions. I didn’t feel them too much this time
thanks to some nifty taping and the screaming pain of something tearing in my
right foot (who knew you needed a flexor digitalis longus tendon to make your
foot move).
As I dragged my sorry self into Checkpoint 12 at 80 miles, with an
ankle that was starting to look like an elephant's trunk ready to throw in the
towel, it was only two cheerful blokes who encouraged me to swallow my pride
and some pain killers that got me out the door and home again. Whoever you are,
and the dozens of others who helped along the way, I salute you. The true
legends of an endurance event are those working in the Checkpoints where food
and drink and funny stories are served. Never have I felt so graciously cared
for, so well fed, so cheered up, so supported by strangers, working all through
the night and into the next day for nothing but the love of the sport.
I was also encouraged by fellow walkers, complete strangers who helped each other even when detrimental to their own interests; who inspired in their
ability to slice their own blisters or butterfly clip their own cuts and
keep on going; who swapped food, plasters, water and directions. I kept running
into people that I'd met at other events over the last six months that created
a sense of fellowship. I thought often of the much older woman who sat next to
me on the bus to the start, a grandmother who’s grandkids know never to ask for
her on a Sunday as she’s ‘out running’. There were the awesome ladies from 'the
North'. I don't know what they put in the water up there but it's special. And Stephanie,
on her 6th 100, who hadn’t been able to eat or drink anything
without throwing up since about the half way mark, who still made it home an hour in
front of me.
Just as my body is a bit old-fashioned, so too my approach to
navigation. It’s possibly just envy that those with GPS don’t spend an extra couple
of hours on the course finding their way as those of us with just map and
compass do, but such technology seems to lose the art of walking, or at least
way-finding. Okay, it’s not fun when it’s 4 in the morning and freezing and I
have lost my place in the route description and therefore have no idea where I
am. But the skill of map reading, of understanding the scratchings and
squiggles on a piece of laminated paper, brings us into a deeper relationship
with the landscape as the brain translates two dimensions into three.
At the end, however an endurance eventer finds their way home, we all
share that sense of achievement and the most delicious of meals where we can
actually sit down and stay down (it could be cat food and we’d still enjoy it). We recount
our favourite and most horrendous bits and forget the throbbing feet. One of my
fellow saunterers pointed out how 'unnecessary' the routing of this year’s event
over stony tracks had been. Strictly speaking, the whole event could be classified as unnecessary if we were to hold to it standards of normal bodily stress.
But therein also lies its exquisite nature. In a world that is increasingly automated and technologically mediated, there is great freedom, as Thoreau recognised in the 19th century, in just putting on boots and walking. Doing so over long distances may not increase any sense of freedom but it does require that the body, long subsumed to the predominance of a brain-led economy, must be felt. In order to finish, the mind must override the body but can only do so on the basis of trust; that it will not break down, that it will heal itself. There is no room in a long distance event for any of Descartes's dualism as unnatural tirednss and physical exhaustion blur or even rupture (hence the hallucinations) the veil between mind and matter. The mind extends into space via the body, and the body begins to think that it can go on.
So despite swearing I would never be so stupid as to do it again, the strange
thing is that today I found myself going over the route for next year. The
chance to be part of something akin to a holy art is all too
addictive.
No comments:
Post a Comment